Intuition and Writing

Posted byJaynePosted inon writingTags:, , , , , ,

“Your intuition knows what to write, so get out of the way.” -Ray Bradbury

Writing can be like a faucet; turn the knobs of your imagination and let the words flow. Those are on good nights. Like most writers, I love those nights. There are times when our intuition is clearer and times when we are in complete silence. I think it’s good, the waxing and waning. On the nights that I have no idea what to write, I look inside myself or toward one of the greats. Whatever comes first.

Another interesting thing to keep in mind is that when you are constantly in touch with your intuition, you forget it’s there, and it just feels like disconnection.

How do you feel about intuition? Do you think you need it as a writer?

I don’t think we need it but I think it really helps.

Jung says,

“The creative aspect of life, which finds its clearest expression in art, baffles all attempts at rational formation.”

Carl Jung on Creativity

Published by Jayne

Jayne is a writer. On her free time she likes to be with her family hiking outdoors and traveling. New England is her home and place of birth. When asked what she wants to teach the world she replied, "Don't stop searching. Too many times, in my old life, I put my search aside for more 'important matters.' I didn't realize the thing I was searching for held what was most important; my soul purpose." Jayne works daily on improving her craft and at times can get down on herself, but her favorite morning mantra is "It's a new day." and that's what she strives to start with.

5 thoughts on “Intuition and Writing”

  1. Personally, I’d rather write about inspiration, mixed with other human emotions. I don’t agree with Jung. I think there is rational formation behind art. I would argue that it’s all about formation, even if it’s abstract.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. I also like to write about human emotions and diversity in thoughts. Getting inside the minds of ny characters is always fun for me.

      I think its bold to disagree with Jung. At the same time, I also don’t agree with some of his work.

      Whether art is rational or not I think is up to the artist. I think as humans we can rationalize anything but was the artist in a rational state of mind. And would it be OK if we had some things in the world that didnt need to be rationalized?

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. I believe it’s impossible to know what state of mind an artist is or their personal reasoning behind their work. That’s why, for me, it’s more important what the reader, listener, etc. think is happening, what they come up with as a rational explanation. The prime example for this would be Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Just simple horror story or?? Many people have made careers from their own reading of the book. This is why I also think a writer should not explain their work to readers. Once it’s completed, let the world work it out. Jung and Freud wanted to explain the source, when it’s the destination that’s important. But there are Freudian readings of Frankenstein. Especially the prime motivation behind the monster’s anger was that he wanted Frankenstein to make him a mate. Take care Jayne! Always a pleasure

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I always love a comment that makes me think! Frankenstein is one of my most favorite reads. I will be thinking about this Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. They are very interesting 🤔

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.